About every two minutes, someone in the U.S. is diagnosed with lung cancer, and every day, lung cancer takes the lives of more than 357 of our friends, neighbors and loved ones. But now there is hope, as more Americans than ever are surviving lung cancer. While the disease remains the leading cause of cancer deaths among both women and men, over the past five years, the survival rate has increased by 22% nationally to 26.6%. Additionally, it has increased at a faster pace among communities of color such that it is no longer significantly lower compared to white Americans. 

This year’s report also examines the lifesaving potential of lung cancer screening, which can detect the disease at an earlier stage when it’s more curable, and the importance of advancements in lung cancer research which holds the promise for better treatment options. 

Based on new research, in March 2021, the United States Preventive Services Task Force expanded its recommendation for screening to include a larger age range and more current and former smokers. This dramatically increased the number of women and Black Americans who are considered at high risk for lung cancer. Unfortunately, in 2022, only 4.5% of all those eligible were screened.

For the fourth consecutive year, the “State of Lung Cancer” report explores the lung cancer burden among racial and ethnic minority groups at the national and state levels. In addition to lower survival rates, people of color who are diagnosed with lung cancer face worse outcomes compared to white Americans: they are less likely to be diagnosed early, less likely to receive surgical treatment, and more likely to not receive any treatment. 

A strategic imperative of the American Lung Association is to defeat lung cancer, and to do so, we use a variety of tactics and stakeholders to address the disease and its risk factors, including public policy efforts and public health protections, awareness of lung cancer screening and more. 

The “State of Lung Cancer” report provides a state-specific understanding of the burden of lung cancer and opportunities to address this deadly disease. 

It does not reflect the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer diagnosis, treatment, or survival as the data in the report preceded the emergence of the novel coronavirus. 

The report also serves as both a guidepost and rallying call, providing policymakers, researchers, healthcare practitioners, as well as patients, caregivers and others committed to ending lung cancer by identifying where their state can best focus its resources to decrease the toll of lung cancer. 

While we have seen advances in personalized treatment thanks to biomarker testing, targeted therapy and immunotherapy, and saved more lives through the introduction of lung cancer screening, the burden of lung cancer is not the same everywhere. Treatment, exposure to risk factors, and use and coverage of screening vary from state to state. To save more lives, it’s critical to prevent lung cancer when possible and diagnose the disease as early as possible. Additionally, everyone should have access to therapies that may extend or improve the quality of their life. 

By better understanding the impact of lung cancer at the state level, we can encourage interventions to save and extend lives. This report considers the following measures of lung cancer burden by state: new cases, survival, early diagnosis, surgical treatment, lack of treatment, screening and prevention, racial disparities and Medicaid fee-for-service program coverage of screening and identifies where each state ranks on each of these measures. 

Policymakers must do more to protect and expand quality and affordable healthcare coverage and improve access for all to lung cancer screening and treatment. 

Close to 238,000 people will be diagnosed with lung cancer this year, with the rate of new cases varying by state. The report finds that Utah has the nation’s best lung cancer rate while Kentucky has the worst at almost 2.4 times the incidence rate of Utah. Over the last five years, the rate of new cases decreased 8% nationally. 

In 2020, the most recent year of data available for this report, the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted access to medical care, including delays and reductions in cancer diagnoses and screening. This led to a decline in 2020 incidence rates for most cancers, including lung cancer, and should not be interpreted as a reduction in the underlying cancer burden. 

There are a variety of risk factors associated with lung cancer, including smoking, exposure to radon gas, air pollution and secondhand smoke. Radon testing and mitigation, healthy air protections, and reducing the smoking rate through tobacco tax increases, smokefree air laws and access to comprehensive quit smoking services are all ways to help prevent new lung cancer cases. 

Lung cancer has one of the lowest five-year survival rates because cases are often diagnosed at later stages, when the disease is less likely to be curable. The national average of people alive five years after a lung cancer diagnosis is 26.6%, which is a 22% improvement over the last five years. Rhode Island ranked best at 33.3%, while Oklahoma ranked worst at 21.2%.

Nationally, only 26.6% of cases are diagnosed at an early stage when the five-year survival rate is much higher (63%). Unfortunately, 44% of cases are not caught until a late stage when the survival rate is only 8%. Early diagnosis rates increased 9% over the last five years nationally and were best in Massachusetts (33.3%) and worst in Hawaii (20.3%).

Early diagnosis rates did not decrease significantly in 2020, despite the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to medical care. 

Lung cancer can often be treated with surgery if it is diagnosed at an early stage and has not spread. Nationally, 20.8% of cases underwent surgery, which was a 4% improvement over the last five years. Rates ranged from best at 31.3% in Massachusetts to worst at 13.5% in New Mexico. 

Surgical treatment rates decreased by 4% in 2020, likely due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to medical care. 

Patients who are not healthy enough to undergo the procedure or whose cancer has spread may not be candidates for surgery. Other treatments may be recommended instead of or in addition to surgery, such as chemotherapy, radiation, targeted therapy or immunotherapy. This report focuses on surgical treatment because it is more likely to be curative. 

There are multiple reasons why patients may not receive treatment after diagnosis. Some of these reasons may be unavoidable, but no one should go untreated because of lack of provider or patient knowledge, stigma associated with lung cancer, fatalism after diagnosis, or cost of treatment. Nationally, 20.6% of cases did not receive any treatment. Lack of treatment rates improved 2% over the last five years and were best in North Dakota (14.3%) and worst in New Mexico (31.5%).

Lung cancer screening gives us hope in the effort to defeat lung cancer and represents an opportunity to save more lives. Screening with annual low-dose CT scans can reduce the lung cancer death rate by up to 20% by detecting tumors at early stages when the cancer is more likely to be curable. Lung cancer screening has saved 80,000 additional years of life leading to $40 million in savings, which would increase to 500,000 additional years of life and $500 million if all those eligible had been screened (Phillipson et al, 2023). 

Based on new research, in March 2021, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) expanded its recommendation for screening to include a larger age range and more current and former smokers. This dramatically increased the number of women and Black Americans who are considered at high risk for lung cancer. At the same time, the requirement for screening facilities to participate in the lung cancer screening registry in order to receive reimbursement from Medicare for screening scans was removed, which may have led to a decrease in reported scans, especially in some states.

High risk is defined as:


USPSTF Guidelines 2013-2021

USPSTF Guidelines 2021


55-80 years

50-80 years

Smoking History

30 or more pack years (this means 1 pack a day for 30 years, 2 packs a day for 15 years, etc.)

20 or more pack years (this means 1 pack a day for 20 years, 2 packs a day for 10 years, etc.)

Smoking Status

Current smoker or quit within the last 15 years


For screening to be most effective, more of the high-risk population should be screened annually—currently screening rates remain low among those at high risk. Nationally, only 4.5% of those at high risk were screened. Massachusetts has the best screening rate at 11.9%, while California has the worst at 0.7%, although this may not reflect screenings in large, regional managed care providers.

State Medicaid programs are one of the only healthcare payers not required to cover lung cancer screening for the traditional Medicaid population. If screening is covered, Medicaid programs may use different eligibility criteria, require prior authorization or charge individuals for their scans. 

The American Lung Association analyzed lung cancer screening coverage policies in state Medicaid fee-for-service programs to assess the current status of lung cancer screening coverage for the Medicaid population. We found that 49 Medicaid fee-for-service programs cover lung cancer screening, and one program, Alabama, does not provide coverage.

Keys to prevention include limiting tobacco use, radon, air pollution and secondhand smoke, all of which are known to cause lung cancer. However, it is not always possible to identify the cause of an individual patient’s lung cancer. If you have concerns about your risk, because of your exposures or your family history, it is important to share this with your doctor. 

This report contains information and data on exposures to these risk factors on the state level: 

  • Tobacco use is the leading risk factor for lung cancer, accounting for 80 to 90% of cases. While we have seen historic decreases in the national smoking rate, not all Americans or regions of the country have benefited equally. 
  • Secondhand smoke has also been shown to cause lung cancer. There is no safe level of exposure to secondhand smoke. The “State of Lung Cancer” report highlights that making homes, workplaces and public spaces smokefree air zones, with no smoking allowed, can reduce the risk of exposure. This report’s sister, “State of Tobacco Control,” grades states for efforts to protect public spaces from secondhand smoke. 
  • Radon, a naturally occurring radioactive gas, is the second leading cause of lung cancer and the leading cause among nonsmokers. Radon is a colorless and odorless gas that can seep into homes and buildings.

Some geographical areas have naturally higher average radon rates than others, but since any home can be at risk for elevated levels, the only way to know is to do a test. If testing shows interior radon levels at or above the U.S. EPA action level of 4 pCi/L (picoCuries per liter of air) or higher, it is recommended you take corrective measures to reduce your exposure to radon gas. Such measures should also be considered at levels at or above 2 pCi/L. The report highlights the percent of indoor radon tests at or above the EPA action level by state. 

  • Exposure to year-round particle pollution in the air has been shown to cause lung cancer. Each year the American Lung Association releases the “State of the Air” report. The 2023 “State of the Air” report found that close to 20.3 million people lived in counties that had unhealthy levels of air pollution in all categories from 2018 to 2020.
  • The lung cancer survival rate increased 22% over the last five years nationally to 26.6%. 
  • Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT scans has been recommended for those at high risk since 2013, but only 4.5% of those eligible were screened in 2022. 
  • People of color who are diagnosed with lung cancer face worse outcomes compared to white Americans, including: less likely to be diagnosed early, less likely to receive surgical treatment and more likely to receive no treatment. 
  • Nationally, only 26% of cases are diagnosed at an early stage when the five-year survival rate is much higher (61%).  
  • The analysis in the “State of Lung Cancer” serves as a baseline against which future data can be compared, which may be especially beneficial as progress is made on the implementation of lung cancer screening.

As the American Lung Association works toward defeating lung cancer, the goal of the “State of Lung Cancer” report is to empower the public to learn more about lung cancer in their state. Individuals can join the Lung Association’s efforts to end lung cancer by asking their member of Congress to co-sponsor H.R. 4286, the Increasing Access to Lung Cancer Screening Act.

The report looks at key lung cancer measures to highlight the burden and examine opportunities to better address lung cancer at the state level. The report found that lung cancer rates for every measure vary significantly by state, and that every state can do more to defeat lung cancer, such as increasing the rate of screening among those at high risk, addressing racial disparities that impact lung cancer outcomes, decreasing exposure to radon and secondhand smoke, and eliminating tobacco use.  

This report provides unique information for federal and state officials, policymakers, researchers and those affected by lung cancer and emphasizes the need for resources and action to decrease the toll of lung cancer across the country. 

Page last updated: June 7, 2024