Popcorn Lung: A Dangerous Risk of Flavored E-Cigarettes | American Lung Association

This website uses cookies. By continuing you are agreeing to our privacy policy.

Popcorn Lung: A Dangerous Risk of Flavored E-Cigarettes

Outline of lungs over enlarged picture of a popcorn kernel

Over a decade ago, workers in a microwave popcorn factory were sickened by breathing in diacetyl—the buttery-flavored chemical in foods like popcorn, caramel and dairy products. While this flavoring may be tasty, it was linked to deaths and hundreds of cases of bronchiolitis obliterans, a serious and irreversible lung disease. As a result, the major popcorn manufacturers removed diacetyl from their products, but some people are still being exposed to diacetyl - not through food flavorings as a worksite hazard, but through e-cigarette vapor.

When inhaled, diacetyl causes bronchiolitis obliterans - more commonly referred to as "popcorn lung" - a scarring of the tiny air sacs in the lungs resulting in the thickening and narrowing of the airways. While the name "popcorn lung" may not sound like a threat, it's a serious lung disease that causes coughing, wheezing and shortness of breath, similar to the symptoms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Even though we know that diacetyl causes popcorn lung, this chemical is found in many e-cigarette flavors. It is added to "e-juice" liquid by some e-cigarette companies to complement flavorings such as vanilla, maple, coconut and more. So while diacetyl was swiftly removed from popcorn products since it could cause this devastating disease among factory workers, e-cigarette users are now directly inhaling this harmful chemical into their lungs. In fact, researchers at Harvard found that 39 of 51 e-cigarette brands contained diacetyl. The study also found two similarly harmful chemicals—2,3 pentanedione and acetoin—present in 23 and 46 of the 51 flavors it tested. And roughly 92 percent of the e-cigarettes had one of the three chemicals present.

Rows of amber glass bottles and vapor coming off of one in the corner

How is this possible that many Americans are unknowingly inhaling chemicals that can cause traumatic respiratory harm? Unfortunately, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced in July 2017 that it would delay until 2022 the requirement that e-cigarette companies submit their products, including all ingredients, to FDA for review. The American Lung Association and our partners filed a lawsuit against the FDA for this delay, but for the meantime, these products remain on the market until FDA begins to enforce the provisions.

This is an urgent issue for public health, especially given the popularity of e-cigarettes among youth. The American Lung Association believes it's imperative that FDA act quickly to require that diacetyl and other harmful chemicals be removed from e-cigarettes.

Remember, the American Lung Association is here to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. Read our public education statement on E-cigarettes and Lung Health, and when you're ready to quit tobacco for good, we're here to help.

----
Related Topics: Tobacco & Smoking, Health & Wellness,


Leave a comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. If you are new to the site, complete our quick Registration Form to create a User Name and Password.

Sign-In

Comments


Submitted by Bkibbey at: June 2, 2018
How is this direct assault on science still up? Continuing to promote this puts you in the reasoning camp of anti-vaxers and the like. OK, fine, what you are doing is leaving out information on dosage, not outright lying. For instance, as you have to know if you ever looked into this to any degree, that cigarette smoke also contains this same chemical, and that anyone who has smoked has inhaled MASSIVELY higher quantities of it than they ever could in a lifetime of heavy vain of only vapes flavored with this chemical. Yet, no smoker in all of history has ever been diagnosed with popcorn lung. The level of exposure from vaping is so low its beneath negligible. But, hey, who cares that some of us for the first time in our lives are completely free of cigarettes because we now vape (going on six years for me, though I never kicked smoking before for more than a few months). Who cares if there are others like me who'd cease exposure to the 200 plus toxic chemicals in tobacco smoke to vape and expose themselves to know actual health risks outside of those related to nicotine, and that in SIGNIFICANTLY lower doses than they get from smoking. Because that is not acceptable. That does not fit your personal religious faith under which any form of dependence is a sin that must be exterminated, either through giving it up or dying. Better the sinners suffer with cancer if they refuse to convert to your faith. The fact that the American Lung Association still hosts this assault on evidence-based science is simply shameful.
Submitted by mattshel420 at: April 4, 2018
i think some form of good vg or pg should be made based on what we know. then it needs to be dispensed for cheap or people are just going to keep getting harmful vapors
Submitted by Transform2fit at: February 27, 2018
I find it ridiculous how anyone would want to justify vaping. It is really quite simple. The ONLY thing that belongs in your lungs is fresh clean air. Everything else is going to have some negative effects on your lungs and your overall health. Stop trying to justify this ridiculous habit. This comment is not for the writers of the original article but all of those trying to poke holes in the article. Vaping is not healthy, vaping is not safe, vaping will have a negative effect on your life and you are not just effecting yourself but all those around you. Wake up! Get healthy!
Submitted by lanman at: February 22, 2018
More laws to control, do not create a free nation. Word of mouth and education are key in a free society. The consumer is a very savvy individual with the power of Free Choice. A policed nation full of laws is a said state of affairs. I appreciate the information you have given me and I as well will pass it on. Thank you.
Submitted by DoYourHomework at: January 28, 2018
1. Harvard's medical school did NOTHING for free. They're heavily sponsored by a large pharmaceutical investor. http://www.scmp.com/news/world/article/1587769/harvards-health-school-get-record-us350m-gift-hong-kong-philanthropists 2. Diacetyl in the popcorn plants was in a powdered form. 3. The American Lung Association provides no references to these "deaths and hundreds of cases" they're claiming. 4. As the Harvard Medical School has failed to mention, an actual cigarette contains over 100x the Diacetyl that the liquid for an ecigarette does. So far, there seems to be no documentation that tobacco cigarettes have caused "Popcorn Lung". 5. Noone is stupid enough to believe that ecigarettes are harmless - but as per the oldest medical organization in the world, the Royal College of Physicians, they're at LEAST 95% safer than tobacco. 6. Quit buying into headlines and organizations that rely on people to be sick in order to stay in business. 5.
Submitted by Bmh_z28 at: January 28, 2018
Actually this article is somewhat “fake news.” I have vape liquid and don’t have any “Dicaetyl” ingredients at all in mine. I see a lot of comments on here bashing the people who vape. Only common sense has it if had dicaetyl in every vape liquid you purchased, more people would come down with this disease and speak out. Before you judge you should research yourself instead of reading some article which a lot of articles counter this one. Double standard.
Submitted by mags at: January 20, 2018
It is amazing what addicts will tell themselves so they can keep up with their dangerous habits. Those commenting that the American Lung Association is making these biased statements and that their E-cigs won't hurt them. If they were good for you The American Lung Association would not care if you used them. They have no agenda but better Lung Health. Quit Smoking and Vaping and stop making excuses as to why it's better to harm your self with this product or that. Just breath air. Nothing else is meant to go into your lungs. Air feeds your brain without it you are dead.
Submitted by Anonymous at: January 19, 2018
So, why doesn't this mention that cigarettes not only contain the same ingredient, but on a much,much larger scale?
Submitted by Tv420m at: January 14, 2018
I was smoking 1pack a day I would Wheez at night and had a breathing. .now after 3 months of vaping I breath better a have stopped wheezing at night ..it is helping me
Submitted by Newknee at: January 12, 2018
I am a smoker using e ciggs to help quit i guess i should have researched it more. I will definitely try to find ejuice without these 3 items. If you could post some places or brands that are more natural and less harmful. Thank you this was eye opening and will definitely send me on a search for a safer product. The US Government is so hung up on red tape it is unreal they will let people still buy products that KILL them for the almighty dollar.
Submitted by Deb at: January 10, 2018
I have been vaping for four years, and I have found that reputable vape shops do not sell e-liquids containing diacetyl. Most of these shops are not chain shops, but independent ones.
Submitted by Bev at: December 27, 2017
The fact that vaping is being regulated does not change the facts presented in this article. In fact, the article only mentions a few of the chemicals contained in e-cigarettes because those are the ones we have been told about. I believe once these companies are made to expose the actual ingredients, we will find out how much worse the situation actually is. That said, the cigarette industry has been regulated for decades and the public still doesn’t have a detailed ingredients list. The fact is that it is beyond ignorant to think the human body can inhale burning chemicals without repercussions. To target these product at our youth is criminal.
Submitted by John at: November 12, 2017
This article should be updated or removed now that the FDA is regulating e-juice. Also, e-juice is made with vegetable glycerin which may not sound so different than vegetable oil but it is not the same thing and does not cause this disease. The article failed to mention this. It is a shame to see a site like this being so one-sided and vague, disseminating misinformation.
Submitted by BrightDayMiddleOfNight at: September 10, 2017
It's interesting how goofy the people in the comment section are here. Questionioning the authenticity of scholarly scientific journals from Harvard University, no less, our own governments research programs, and nonprofit health organizations. They put in all this hard work for free mostly, so we can be informed. Yet no, they're trials and hours of research means nothing because they believe otherwise. As if the commenters hold any factual counter studies which say this chemical is safe. Personally, thank you lung.org for letting us know about this important health notice. I will now seek organic e-cigarette "juice" for personal consumption.
Submitted by Investigator Charlie at: August 27, 2017
This article is absolute tripe! It is very deceptive to spread misinformation to the public under the guise of "urgent issue for public health" Think for yourself, do your own research, and don't be a sheep. According to snopes, Tobacco cigarettes have long been known to contain diacetyl, e-cigarettes have very little to none at all. Daily exposure to diacetyl from smoking is 750 times higher, on average, than exposure to diacetyl from vaping. In a 2014 study on tobacco consumption, diacetyl, and popcorn lung, the highest concentration in e-cigarettes is lower than the lowest concentration in tobacco cigarettes! Other earlier tobacco studies also found that even the highest levels in tobacco cigarettes were still NOT ENOUGH TO CAUSE POPCORN LUNG in smokers. Source: http://www.snopes.com/vaping-causes-popcorn-lung/
Submitted by Justin at: August 2, 2017
This article is nothing but false information. Ejuice company's have stopped using diacetyl in there juices for a while now. Before you guys right an article at least be educated about what your writing about.
Submitted by Jon at: July 31, 2017
I'm 42 and smoked at least 2 packs a day for the better part of 27 years. I have vaped HEAVILY and consistently for the last 4 years and have NEVER breathed better in my life since I started smoking at 12. Now I am sure there are health risks to any of it but cutting out the multitude of chemicals and carcinogens found in inhaling something that is literally on fire is a step in the right direction. Go on somewhere else with your propaganda...
Submitted by Pertn at: March 25, 2017
As someone working in the flavor industry, this article is pretty much a joke and it undermines the point they are trying to make. The entire flavor industry has stopped using diacetyl as an ingredient. Period. The Harvard study not only makes no distinction between naturally occurring diacetyl (you know, like in butter, cream, buttermilk, etc) and added diacetyl. I can assure you there is no added diacetyl in any of those flavors. Also, they only claim diacetyl is detected but they stop short of saying "at a harmful level". As usual in a lab, they have no way to say if that detectable level is even harmful. There is a much simpler, logical argument to be made here without a flimsy study. The flavoring for e-cigs are just that - flavoring. They are meant to be ingested not breathed in. This article focuses on diacetyl, because it's an easy scapegoat. However, what about benzaldehyde, a key ingredient for almond and cherry? At even a moderate level, it is an irritant. That has a strict legal limit in flavors used for beauty and healthcare, but not for breathing in. That's where your argument should be. The fact is we don't know what effect literally thousands of flavoring ingredients have on the lungs. E-cigs are a powder keg waiting to explode once people who vape start getting sick because of the multitude of flavor compounds being ingested into people's lungs that never should have been in the first place. My employer has walked away from serving e-cig manufacturers for this reason. We may indirectly supply them, through brokers (where we have no control of where the flavors end up), but we will never sell flavor to them directly. Regarding butter flavor, we do use acetyl methyl carbinol and acetyl propionyl because we have literally no other way to provide butter flavor. However, the article says they are harmful with no citation whatsoever, so good job, article author.
Submitted by Modbusters at: February 21, 2017
You know this report reminds of a friend of mine telling me how much more dangerous my E cig is over smoking .as he puts a nic patch in his mouth to tear it open to place the patch on his arm nothing happened he is fine but still smoking that was a year ago my lungs are shot due to smoking and my work history.I am 58 started smoking when I was 14 .but I have not had a cig in over two years . Vapeing can not undo what smoking has done to my lungs .but I have not had to do a breathing treatment every morning like before I have not done any and only used one refill on my inhaler.fact not fiction so all this can be documented from the doctors ecigs got me away from cigarettes and that's a fact it bothers me to see people still smoking and I can't say nothin with the new laws they wouldn't listen any how to me scare tactics going on mixed with denial so if you want facts get ahold of me I got plenty of them .
Submitted by Bob Nulph at: January 18, 2017
This IRKS the HECK out of me, you know why? I have what will eventually be a terminal lung disease or will require a double lung transplant and my disease is of the Idiopathic ("of no known origin") type. So I can't say I was dumb enough to use E-Cigs and poor me I am now sick and it's YOUR fault, not mine..... Sorry, you are still WILLINGLY inhaling and how can you be surprised to end up sick??
Ask An Expert

Questions about your lung health? Need help finding healthcare? Call 1-800-LUNGUSA.

Get help
We need your generous support

Make a difference by delivering research, education and advocacy to those impacted by lung disease.

What is LUNG FORCE?

LUNG FORCE unites women and their loved ones across the country to stand together in the fight against lung cancer.

Get involved